True Justice for William B. Brock - Listen to the Facts of this Cover Up

Justice for William B. Brock Share:

You Can Help by Sending this letter to your Congressman

Click Here to Find Your Congressman

Note: If You Have More Than One Congressman Address Them all

Let's Expose Corporate Cover-up and get Justice for William B. Brock

The official report is that William B. Brock killed himself, but Mr. Brock was murdered. The goal of this site is to get Justice for William B. Brock.

Justice for William B. Brock

William B. Brock was recruited by Volkswagen as an Equal Employment Opportunity Administrator in the Personnel Office of the Westmoreland Plant in July 1977.  According to court documents Mr. Brock was assured that he'd be responsible for the development and implementation of corporate efforts to employ blacks while ensuring the full compliance of Civil Rights and Equal Employment Opportunity Laws in the operation of the Volkswagen plant in New Stanton, Pennsylvania. 

Court documents also indicated that Volkswagen undertook public and private surveillance of Mr. Brock, including electronic surveillance and monitoring of the business, social and personal activities of Mr. Brock. In addition, Volkswagen communicated threats to the life and safety of Mr. Brock and his family and fabricated knowingly false and groundless information while threatening to publicly defame Mr. Brock's character based on it. 

On Jan 5, 1983 just days before his death, Mr. Brock and other members of the VW Black Caucus were summoned to a meeting at the Volkswagen Westmoreland Plant.   During that meeting Volkswagen attempted to coerce members of the VW Black Caucus into withdrawing and abandoning the $70million dollar class action discrimination lawsuit (Civil Action No 83-5) Filed against Volkswagen. According to court documents Volkswagen attempted to coerce, intimidate and threaten Mr. Brock to refrain from participating in the Civil Action himself and also to take actions to prevent other members of the Black Caucus from pursuing the Civil Action against Volkswagen as well. That meeting had the opposite effect; in fact it upset Mr. Brock so much so that he joined that lawsuit.

Court documents indicated that on the day of the alleged suicide Mr. Brock told friends that he was selling his Audi because he'd just bought a Porsche. Documents also indicated that he told friends on the Friday of the alleged suicide that he'd see them at the meeting on the following Monday. Mr. Brock had just joined a $70 million dollar class action discrimination lawsuit where he himself had the Mr. Bulk of the Damaging Information against Volkswagen. According to a New York Times article he goes home and shoots himself.

Read The Article Here

The article doesn't mention that Mr. Brock was LEFT HANDED shot in the BACK of the RIGHT side of his head. Does that sound like suicide to you?

For more information to substantiate these facts don't hesitate to contact us via e-mail…

Please help us expose corporate cover-up and get Justice for William B. Brock...!!!

Steps already taken to GET JUSTICE FOR WILLIAM B. BROCK...!!!

Quick Nav: 1988 | 1989 1990-1993 | 1993 | 1994 | 1995 | 1996 | 2003 | 2006 | 2007 | 2008| 2009 | 2012 | 2013 | 2016Interesting Facts

In 2016

I contacted Al Sharpton, the operator answered the phone, and when I stated the case she said she could not help me because the case was over 30 years ago and hung up, then I called back to speak to a supervisor she said I am the supervisor and hung up again. The number I called was 877-626-4651.

The Justice for Brock campaign is working diligently to include Congress in the efforts of getting U.S. Justice Department involved in the process of uncovering this acrimonious corporate cover up, conspiracy scandal. We’ve contacted several congressmen to hold them accountable to the letters they've received from you and other constituents throughout the United States. On Friday May 13th 2016 we attempted to contact the local Houston office of Congressman Gene Green at 10:57am (281) 999 5879, we spoke to Yoruba in the Houston office to determine the process of setting an appointment regarding the numerous letters received from you and other supporters of the Justice for Brock campaign. Yoruba said we must contact Ms. Ronda Jackson who is the current Chief of Staff for Congressman Gene Green, she also advised that Ms. Jackson is located in the Washington D.C. office, and provided the contact number (202) 225 1188. At 11:08am we contacted the Washington D.C. office and reached Juston Acley who advise Ms. Jackson was out of the office he inquired about the nature of our call, it was explained that we were attempting to follow up with Congressman Gene Green about the countless letters his office received about Justice for William B. Brock from his constituents to no avail. Mr. Acley advised that his office would conduct their own investigation and follow up with us.

In 2013

Updates were made to the website that include, the ability for others like yourself to participate in seeking justice for William B. Brock by joining the campaign to draw national attention to the murder and cover up William B. Brock the most prominent minority executive with Volkswagen the automaker. Joining this effort allows us to help fight a system of injustice and bring further attention to this matter. We have spoken on radio stations like with Host Jeffery L. Boney who currently broadcasts Mon through Fri from 9a to 12p E.S.T we also have additional broadcast dates scheduled in 2014. We have also been invited to broadcast on Blog Talk Radio, a station that airs on Thursday's at 1:00pm EST. with Host Phyllis Wilson. For further information please feel free to contact us. We've created a pre-written letter to be sent to your Congressional rep in an effort to solicit law makers to respond to this murder / corporate cover-up. We've added a page that lists our growing supporters. We've also added to the website a flyer that can be easily printed and then handed out at your local church, community gatherings, to friends, family members, co-worker and anyone else you can think of, to help spread the word to get Justice for William B. Brock. 

You can help by conducting discussions in your local church, book, civic and/or social clubs, sharing the information with your Facebook, Linked In, or with your other networking friends. By printing our flyers to handout within the community, talking to your local media about facts and why authority refuses to explore them. Mail or Fax the pre-written letter to your Congressional Representative after sending the pre-written letter to your Rep. please, return to the website and click on and complete the "Next Step" link and ask EVERYONE that you know to do the same in an effort to encourage the immediate involvement of The U.S. Department of Justice to expose murder and corporate cover-up.


| Back to Quick Nav 

In 2012

This website was designed to reach out to you the public, to bring local, national, and international attention to this matter.  To secure public awareness of this case and bring it into the spotlight, to make an appeal to the United States Judicial System, to RE-OPEN and RE-EXAMINE the facts related to the untimely death of Mr. Brock.  Due to the fact that William Bryant Brock DID NOT commit suicide but, his murder was made to look like he took his own life.  Additionally, we plan to publicly expose the party or parties responsible for his death, and hold them accountable to the fullest extent of the law.  We are tireless in our efforts to make it known that Mr. Brock was an admirable and productive member of society.  In addition, we plan to bring to light the fact that it is morally and ethically wrong for a man to be murdered for doing the job he was recruited to do.

| Back to Quick Nav

In 2009

A campaign began to reach out to the different media sources for assistance to no avail.  The following media sources were contacted; CNN, AC360, CBS, NPR, ABC, WPXI News Pittsburgh, WTAE News Pittsburgh, The New York Times, and several other media sources.  Each wanted more detailed information about who killed Mr. Brock's.  All the news agencies contacted, seemed to take interest in the case, but refused to investigate the matter further.  It’s quickly being discovered that if they had the financial resources, perhaps Hollywood’s depiction large amounts of wealth can simply payoff the legal system is true.  How deep in government is the reach of the reach of criminal enterprise?  Are those that possess billions of dollars above the law?  Does the justice system only apply to those who aren’t billionaires? 

| Back to Quick Nav

In 2008

Furnished with the more compelling evidence, like the forged suicide note on January 14, 2008, the U.S. Attorney General’s office was written to petition a prompt response.  An acknowledgment of that correspondence was never received.  So, the FBI was contacted, they also refused to help, unless they were invited in by the local authorities. This was puzzling and very disturbing after seeing all over local news that the FBI was investigating the local District Attorney’s office in November 2007.  An inquiry was made about the possibility of getting help from the FBI if there was suspicion of profiteering or decent at the hands of local authorities, it was reiterated that the FBI would not intervene without local authorities inviting them in.  Even under suspected wrong doing, there was nothing that the FBI would do to intervene and Get Justice for William B. Brock.  While preparing to reach out to the U.S. Justice Department again; attention was brought to the fact that Washington County had finally replaced their District Attorney; it was known that it’d be futile to reach out to the U.S. Attorney without 1st attempting to approach the new Washington County District Attorney.  On Feb 08, 2008, The New D.A. was contacted and the myriad of impelling evidence from years of incessant inquiry, fact-finding, and fishing expeditions that had uncovered indisputable evidence was presented to him, he advised that he was impressed by the data that he’d seen.  So much so that he stated he was going to get Mr. Brock’s son before a grand jury to finally get Justice for William B. Brock.   In another attempt to obtain a copy of the original police report, to get all of the facts of what took place on the night of the alleged suicide, a follow up phone call was placed to the City Solicitor, and on February 26, 2008, a denial response was received from the City Solicitor’s Office.  They refused to release a copy of the police report even with the FOIA request.  The New District Attorney gave personal assurance that he made his chief county detective responsible for looking into this matter and it would likely take a few weeks to examine the case.

The new District Attorney insisted Mr. Brock’s son not to talk to anyone else, especially the media, about the facts of the case.  The New District  Attorney was allotted time and space to examine facts related to the sensitive nature of this case, it was soon noticed that The New District Attorney began a pattern of avoidance.  Additional sources of aid were sought, on June 27, 2008, NBC Nightly News was contacted in an attempt to purchase archived video tapes of news footage of Mr. Brock.  On July 02, 2008, another attempt was made to reach the District Attorney but, it was clear that these efforts were also futile.  On July 19, 2008, contact was finally made with The District Attorney, who advised that the hold-up was due to his endeavors to involve the State Police in this investigation.  Troubled by that response, Mr. Brock’s son replied, “You’re the D.A. you simply make a phone call and the State Police are involved.”  He explained.  “The old administration is retiring and he worked better with the new administration,” so he was asked, “Out of curiosity, who’s the old administration?”  When the District Attorney provided the retiring State Police Officer’s name, it became apparent that he had no real interest in pursuing this case, because the retiring State Police Officer was the original Criminal Investigating Detective of the Pennsylvania State Police that had begun examining this case back in 2003 in the first place.  The only officer, that’s ever really shown any real interest in Getting Justice for William B. Brock; Trust and complete confidence in the Washington County legal system, was lost instantly.

Frustrated with this ridiculous and unreasonable process on October 16, 2008, the Supervisory Special Agent at the Pennsylvania Office of the Attorney General Bureau of Criminal Investigations, located in Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, was contacted.  Also to be told by that office that they wouldn’t step in unless they were invited in by local authorities, even if local authorities were suspected of corruption.  Due to his unreasonable response, a request was made that his office put that answer in writing.  He declared they weren’t going to put it in writing under any circumstances.  Not knowing what else to do and feeling overwhelmed with thoughts that this absolutely has to be a deliberate machinery designed specifically as collaboration to discourage the determination and attempts to get Justice for William B. Brock.  In one of letters that Mr. Brock wrote, to address a threat to his life by a Volkswagen official, he wrote, “Be informed that everything including death can be reinforcing under certain circumstances.  Also overuse of punishment weakens its effectiveness if people get used to it.”  One of the goals this mission is to make those words resonate true for Mr. Brock in his absence.

| Back to Quick Nav

In 2007

During the ladder half of 2007 it was decided to reach out to the U.S. Attorney General due to disturbing information was found online about the District Attorney of Washington County, Pennsylvania was being investigated by the FBI.  In about the same year Mr. Brock’s son visited the Register of Wills to determine if  Mr. Brock had a will.  While at the Register of Wills office, the clerk spoke very highly of Mr. Brock and his accomplishments in the city of Washington County, Pennsylvania. The clerk acknowledged that her children went to school with Mr. Brock’s younger children.  Later that night as result of that visit a disturbing, threatening phone call was received; from someone who didn't like the fact that so much digging was being done.  Also in 2007 Mr. Brock’s son hired an attorney who thought he could help draw enough interest to the case to get it opened; unfortunately the efforts and approach were unsuccessful.  In another attempt to obtain a copy of the original police report to get all of the facts of what took place in Mr. Brock’s home, on the night of the alleged suicide.  The Washington County City Solicitor’s Office received a FOIA ( Freedom of Information Act ) Request.
Additionally, in October 2007 leading handwriting expert Curtis Baggett examine the alleged suicide note found near Mr. Brock’s body and compare it to other known handwriting of Mr. Brock.  He discovered that the alleged suicide note was forged and he is willing to prove this in a court of law.  

But, it’s got to get to court.

| Back to Quick Nav

In 2006

The Pennsylvania State Attorney’s office was contacted to inform them of the suspicion of iniquitous behavior and plead for their intervention and assistance in an attempt to supersede the possible corruption in Washington County government.  Based on the continued encountered road block with the Washington County City Police Department, Pennsylvania State Police and many other road blocks confronted such as: continued failed attempts with the Washington County District Attorney, former members of the VW Black Caucus, and former employees of Mr. Brock.  It was communicated from the Pennsylvania State Attorney’s office that nothing would or could be done unless they were invited in by local law enforcement. If there's corruption in local law enforcement, then why would they invite them?

| Back to Quick Nav

In 2003

The Washington County Office of the Pennsylvania State Police was contacted, specifically a Detective In the Criminal Investigative Unit the officer agreed that the facts of this case sounded awfully fishy and began to look into the inconsistencies’ of this case. The officer gave his assurance that he took the facts of this case seriously and gave his word that he’d thoroughly examine these discrepancies  A few days later the Detective declared, "this case is really deep, your father did not kill himself, and we're going to get to the bottom of this."  He extended an additional contact number to reach him. He vowed to follow up in a few days, two days, turned into two weeks, and then far too long since he had followed up.   After several attempts to reach the Detective on the numbers that he provided and upon realizing he couldn't be reach on either of the numbers that he himself extended, it became extremely frustrating after several attempts and no success.  Colonel Miller, the Chief of the Pennsylvania State Police, was contacted in an attempt to reach that Detective to determine why he refused to answer any calls. Col. Miller requested a couple of days to look into the situation.  When the Col. followed up, he advised that this case was out of his jurisdiction; they couldn't help and refused to go into further detail. Mr. Brock's son then asked, "If I walked up to someone in that jurisdiction, put a gun to their head and pulled the trigger, are you saying you couldn't arrest me because it's out of your jurisdiction?"  The Col. said, "Sir, I can't help you" and terminated the call.

This was interpreted as someone above the Pennsylvania State Police insisting that their office cease and desist, investigating.


| Back to Quick Nav

In 1996

Dr.Cyril Wecht, one of the best pathologists in the country was asked, has he ever dealt with suicide?  He said, "Of course." Then he was asked where people shoot themselves?  He said, "Men tend to shoot themselves in the mouth, under the chin or in the temple; women typically tend to shoot themselves in the heart because they want an open casket funeral." When asked has he EVER dealt with a suicide case where a LEFT HANDED man shot himself in the BACK of the RIGHT side of his head?  He said, "No.”  And the doctor asked, What did the coroner's inquest say?" It was explained that there was NO inquest; there was a report but no inquest.  He said,That sounds like foul play.” 

Over the next several years family members were interviewed along with friends to learn more about the active life of Mr. Brock.  Prior to his death, he had been elected branch president of the Washington County office of the NAACP and was considering running for Mayor in Washington County,  those who knew him said he would’ve won hands down.  He was a 3rd degree black belt in several different forms of martial arts; he owned a cleaning service in the city of Pittsburgh.  He didn't even own a gun but, he borrowed the gun from his brother due to the continued death threats on his life and cross burnings on his front lawn. 

| Back to Quick Nav

In 1995

The former attorney for the VW Black Caucus was contacted, to request his assistance in pursuing an effort to persuade law enforcement to re-examine the facts of  this case. While standing in the attorney’s office Mr. Brocks son was warned,  “You'd better leave this case alone, before what happened to your father happens to you." The mere mention of that statement denotes the fact that he knew in his heart that Mr. Brock DID NOT commit suicide.  General thought would’ve been  'If, he killed himself, that won't happen to me.'  After several attempts of reaching out to former members of the VW Black Caucus for assistance with exposing this obvious cover-up, the common response was always the same,  "I've got a family." This reaction is a clear declaration of fear.  If William B. Brock committed suicide what are these people so afraid of?  William Bryant Brock lost his life fighting for the Civil Rights of others minorities.  
The question is… Who will fight to Get Justice for William B. Brock?

| Back to Quick Nav

In 1994

In going to the U.S. District Court for the Western District of Pennsylvania Civil Action No. 83-1192, was pulled from the archives.  Parts of the records were sealed for 50 yearsspecifically the records indicating the amount of money received by Mr. Brock’s Widow.  The portion of the records that were not sealed named several high ranking VW officials as defendants in the civil suit that Mr. Brock’s widow brought against VW.  Namely, The Vice President of group manufacturing, The Former Plant Manager, Vice President of Personnel, Industrial Relations, Corporate Director of Personnel, Corporate Counsel, Plant Manager of South Charleston, West Virginia, Production Manager, General Administrator of salaried personnel, Director of Personnel, Production Supervisor, General Administrator of salaried personnel, Personnel Director, General Superintendent of Production, and Superintendent of Production.

Back to Quick Nav

Interesting Facts:

Court documents disclosed the fact that the defendants violated Mr. Brock's privacy, forced and coerced his violation of Federal and State laws by requiring that his telephone conversations be electronically recorded, including conversations with federal and state officers charged with the enforcement of equal employment and civil rights statutes. They subjected Mr. Brock to racial hostility, humiliation, threats, and a malicious work atmosphere. In response to Mr. Brock's opposition to this treatment that the defendants conspired and combined to harass, injure and deprive Mr. Brock of his employment by making knowingly false reports of Mr. Brock's conduct and performance, continued to harass, threaten and intimidate Mr. Brock!!!!

Documents pointed out the fact that the company assured
Mr. Brock that during his tenure at the Volkswagen Westmoreland plant that he’d be developing and implementing the corporate efforts to employ blacks at the plant. In addition it was discovered in this document that each defendant was responsible for continual punishment, retaliation and continued threats of extortion for opposing the racial discrimination and unlawful act of the defendants!!!!

Court documents further acknowledged that the defendants undertook public and private surveillance of Mr. Brock, including electronic surveillance and monitoring of the business, social, and personal activities of Mr. Brock; filed false reports as to his conduct and performance; communicated threats to the life and safety of Mr. Brock and his family and fabricated knowingly false and groundless charges of sexual harassment against Mr. Brock.

On January 5, 1983 Days Before his Death, Mr. Brock and other members of the VW Black Caucus were summoned to a meeting at the Westmoreland plant by The Directors of Personnel,  The Corporate Counsel for Volkswagen and The Corporate Director of Personnel in an attempt to coerce members of the VW Black Caucus to withdraw and abandon the Civil Action No. 83-5, further they attempted to coerce, intimidate and threaten Mr. Brock to refrain from participating in the Civil Action himself, in addition they wanted Mr. Brock to take actions to prevent other members of the VW Black Caucus from pursuing the lawsuit. Corporate Counsel for Volkswagen the abiding Director of Personnel and the Corporate Director of Personnel threatened Mr. Brock with knowingly false and groundless charges of sexual harassment by The Production Supervisor furthermore they threatened to knowingly file and publicly expose additional fabricated charges by other employees.

Some really interesting facts were discovered during further research. Namely that Mr. Brock
DID NOT go to Volkswagen for employment but, rather he was recruited by Volkswagen when they were experiencing tumultuous times related to the black community, as local black newspapers leveled attacks on the companies hiring practices and black community leaders threatened boycotts, lead marches, and pray-ins at the plant gates.  In July 1977 William B. Brock was recruited, as an Equal Employment Opportunity Administrator in the personnel office at the Westmoreland plant.  He was assured that he would be drafting a solid affirmative action plan to ensure full compliance with The Civil Rights and Equal Employment Opportunity Laws at The Volkswagen Westmoreland Plant.  There were more than 4,000 employees at that plant.  Mr. Brock himself was responsible for a 10% minority representation on the workforce and a screeching halt in public outcries and demonstrations against Volkswagen by the press, the black community, and government agencies,


The court documents indicated that certain defendants had relocated to Michigan. One of those defendants really drew some attention, specifically The General Administrator of Salaried Personnel; Mr. Brock’s son attained his home phone number in Michigan.  When the former VW employee was reached on the phone he was asked. "Did you ever work for Volkswagen out in New Stanton Pennsylvania?"  He excitedly responded "Yeah, I worked out there...!!!" Mr. Brock’s son responded,  "Great, just the guy I want to talk to. I'm doing some research into my old man's death, and I wanted to ask you a couple of real quick questions.” You would’ve thought he'd seen a ghost by his next response; he’d begun to stutter, his voice became instantly shaken and he sounded extremely fearful.  “I, I, I, didn’t, I, didn't know your father." he said.  He wasn’t aware that Mr. Brock’s son had already done his homework and spoken with several former employees of Mr. Brock, he also had in his possession correspondence that both that former VW employee and His Father had written back and forth to one another, court documents implicating that the former VW employee was named as a defendant in the Civil Action lawsuit that Mr. Brock’s widow filed against Volkswagen due to Mr. Brock’s untimely demise.  Mr. Brock’s son replied. Respectfully, sir, I didn’t give you his name; his name was William B. Brock."  The former VW employee then said begrudgingly, still stuttering and still sounding extremely fearful “I, I, I, didn’t, didn’t know your father.”  Mr. Brock’s son reciprocated, "I find that difficult to believe considering, I've got several letter's that my father had written to you and several that you'd written back to him. I note that he sat 3 desks away from you for 3 years. He was the ONLY black man in the office and you guys had several run ins."  Then the former VW employee's demeanor was obviously rattled and flustered, still stuttering he answered, "I, I, I, didn’t, I didn't kill him."  Mr. Brock’s son replied,  I didn't say that you did.”  Then, the former Volkswagen employee terminated the call.  In law enforcement, this action is called Spontaneous Utterance. That means the person knows more than they're alluding too.

Back to Quick Nav 


In 1993

Furnished with this persuasive information, the Washington County District Attorney that held his office for 10 years, at that point was approached to petition his office to re-examine the facts surrounding Mr. Brock's death.  Armed with documented threats on company letterhead.  Additionally, equipped with the fact that Mr. Brock was LEFT HANDED, shot in the BACK of the RIGHT side of his head with a 38 caliber pistol, with an 8 inch barrel, the FACT that the bullet entered just above his RIGHT ear in the BACK of his HEAD, and exited the TOP of his head.  These facts raised monumental questions from even the average person.  It is extremely disturbing to discover that a 10 year, seasoned District Attorney, had absolutely no interest in examining ANY of these new facts.  Because the efforts taken thus far were getting nowhere with law enforcement officials, it was decided after further review of other documents surrounding Mr. Brock's untimely demise; that the terms of the settlement reached between Volkswagen of America Inc., and Mr. Brock’s widow, required a closer examination to understand the details of that agreement because companies don’t typically pay out settlements for suicide.

| Back to Quick Nav

1990 through 1993

In tracking down and interviewing several former close associates, friends, family, former employees, and law enforcement officials, whom Mr. Brock hired when he was employed by the Washington County Office of Employment and Training, knew and said he didn’t kill himself.  All of the facts point to foul play, suspicion, and corporate cover-up.  

| Back to Quick Nav

In 1989

In contacting the Washington County Coroner's office to get specific details about Mr. Brock's death, a copy of the alleged suicide note was acquired.  It was totally baffling because the suicide note, made absolutely no sense at all after reading much of Mr. Brock previous writings and on many occasions realizing that one actually needed a thesaurus to decipher many of the words in his vocabulary.  This alleged suicide note stated, "Dear world, I am your leader, maybe you could consider me."  Then he allegedly took his own life. 

Additionally, a copy of the coroner's report was also acquired.  This was also a little perplexing, determining how in the world this could be ruled a suicide?  After examining the coroner's report and discovering that the bullet from the 38' caliber pistol with the 8' inch barrel entered just above his RIGHT ear then EXITED the TOP of his HEAD. This fact raised considerable questions, due to the fact Mr. Brock was LEFT HANDED and shot in the BACK of the RIGHT side of his head. 

| Back to Quick Nav

In 1988

The Washington County, PA Police Department was contacted to request a copy of the original police report.  The first officer to arrive on the scene on the night of the alleged suicide, gave his statement, based on his recollection, as to what took place that night.  He advised that he believed Mr. Brock actually did commit suicide, the officer’s comments were, I wasnt far from the scene, when I got the call and when I arrived on the scene, there was still smoke coming out of the wound.”  This was a very puzzling statement because Mr. Brock’s widow said after hearing the gun shot, hearing him fall, and knowing what happened, she gathered the children and ran to a neighbor’s to call for help.  Typically when 911 calls are placed, they go directly to the 911 operator, not the police car.  His statement was troubling because Mr. Brock’s head would’ve had to have been on fire for smoke to still be exuding from the wound.  Also, the general protocol among police officer’s is, whenever called to a scene where gunshots are involved, police officers are to wait for back-up to arrive before entering the scene.  As conversation continued with this officer, a copy of the original police report was continuously requested but repeatedly denied.  As a result the continued denial, the Chief of the Washington County Police Department was contacted.  The local police refused to release documents that should have been public record and available to anyone.  Finally the insight of an Internal Affairs office was sought to assist in obtaining these records.  Unfortunately it was discovered that the Washington Police Department had no Internal Affairs office.

| Back to Quick Nav



Time for Change
The black workers at the plant formed a caucus to provide a united front and made Mr. Brock their president and spokesperson. However, conditions didn't improve. Eventually, the black workers filed a $70 million class action discrimination lawsuit against Volkswagen because of the ongoing racial discrimination. Even though Volkswagen attempted to blackmail Mr. Brock, their efforts failed, he joined the lawsuit.  After the death of Mr. Brock, the class action discrimination suit faded away.


The Ending of His Life
William B. Brock died from a gunshot wound to the back of the right side of his head and the bullet exited the top of his head. The day after he was shot, the official report says that it was self-inflicted. However,  the facts point to homicide. There are a number of inconsistencies related to Mr. Brock's death. The evidence indicates a cover up and isn't as it seems.

Contact us if you want to get justice and answers for Mr. Brock.